达里奥·阿莫代伊在信任争议中为Anthropic的AI监管立场辩护

“1/2 Thanks Gavin for an especially thoughtful exchange. I don't usually spend much time on social media but I wanted to engage here because it really brings out the heart of an important conversation. First, on regulation, I think that “either concentrate it in the hands of a chosen few companies and politicians via regulation or distribute it widely” is a false choice. I know that there's a sort of Silicon Valley shorthand where regulation = regulatory capture = concentration of power, but I've always found this to be an overly simplified picture of the world... Overall my view is that AI is *structurally* a technology that tends to concentrate power, for reasons that have nothing to do with regulation (more to do with the extreme implications of the scaling laws). Open-weights do help some with this but are nowhere near a sufficient solution... I am also supportive of Demis Hassabis' ideas around a FINRA-like entity.”

“I am doing my best to stop back from this subject as it should be obvious what we are seeing here. However the arrogance that us commoners are too dumb to catch his grift must be addressed. Receipts: Dario Amodei's carefully worded reply is a masterclass in having it both ways. He frames regulation as a nuanced force for decentralization while his actual track record and recent actions scream regulatory capture designed to protect Anthropic's closed, frontier position. The contradictions are not subtle; they are structural... The deeper contradiction is the one he never resolves: he admits scaling laws structurally concentrate power in the hands of those with the most compute and chips, then claims the right “rules of the road” can simultaneously constrain frontier labs and protect open-weights. Those two statements cannot both be true under the policies he actually advances.”